[CPProt.net] FULL SUPPORT FOR THE LIST! KEEP IT COMING.

Gordon Gullery ggullery at aucklandmuseum.com
Mon Apr 14 06:26:26 CEST 2003


Writing from New Zealand, 

I agree with the "see all views" approach.  My security work in the Museum involves understanding and listening to a great cross-section of people and views.  In New Zealand we receive and provide varying views on both ours and other countries.  I like that approach - some people don't have that human right.  

If I don't like the information (for whatever reason) I may choose to not read it, or even discard it.  Newspaper articles regularly contain information, pictures, stories, low value articles that I do not agree with - but the Newspaper is a grand source of information and writings - one that most of us cannot do without - regardless of the nature of the views I will continue to read newspapers.  I will treat this site the same way - I just hope that there isn't a huge volume of that same view though.

Gordon Gullery



-----Original Message-----
From: Don Messerschmidt [mailto:emodus at wlink.com.np]
Sent: Monday, 14 April 2003 4:11 p.m.
To: Alexander Bauer
Cc: list at cpprot.net; editor at artnose.com
Subject: [CPProt.net] FULL SUPPORT FOR THE LIST! KEEP IT COMING.


Writing from Kathmandu... I agree with Alexander Bauer's comments below.
This is a list of ALL opinions, and those who cut it off because they 
don't agree with or 'don't want to hear' opinions and ideas contrary to 
their own are narrow and petty.

Please keep the list coming with ALL points of view, political, social, 
artistic, etc.

Keep me ON the list - positively!

//Don Messerschmidt

Alexander Bauer wrote:

> A word from someone who cares about the future of this list:
>
> Let's not do this again, everybody.
>
> Please remember that the cpprot mailinglist (and the museum security 
> network before it) allows for the circulation of information and 
> articles about cultural property issues, of which the artnose piece 
> was one.  You do not have to agree with every article that is 
> published, but does it get us anywhere to refuse to hear any side of 
> an issue that does not conform to our own views?
>
> I am surprised that such outbursts have continued, and even happened 
> in the first place, in fact, on an email list that revolves around 
> cultural property issues--one of the most contentious topics there 
> is.  Yes, many people's ethnic and national identities are tied to 
> such property.  Yes, it is a sensitive issue, and I thought we all 
> knew this.  Plenty of people on this list must have had very close 
> emotional reactions to other topics addressed here over the years--the 
> Parthenon (Elgin) Marbles, the Ethiopian remains in Italy, the list 
> can go on--but we have done our best during this time to contain such 
> outbursts.  I think this has been for the better, as it has resulted 
> in a list that keeps us all informed about the many sides of these 
> always difficult issues.
>
> There is certainly little purpose in a list that only tells us what we 
> want to hear (cnn is a pretty good example of this).  It is for all 
> our benefit to hear different views, even if they are not appealing, 
> even if they do not always seem grounded in "fact".  How many of us 
> think that both sides of the US v. Shultz case, for example, are being 
> completely "accurate" in their presentation of their case?  Should we 
> silence one side altogether?  Which would it be?  This is certainly 
> not the American Way in the sense that I am proud of.  So let us not 
> continue to shout every time a point of view we deign to disagree with 
> is posted, or else we will destroy one of the few remaining venues 
> where cultural property issues may be aired with equanimity.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Alexander A. Bauer
>
> Dept. of Anthropology
> University of Pennsylvania
> 325 University of Pennsylvania Museum
> 33rd and Spruce Sts.
> Philadelphia, PA  19104
> www.sas.upenn.edu/~bauer2
>
>
>
> On Sunday, April 13, 2003, at 10:44  PM, Wallace E Sisson wrote:
>
>> I do not expect to see biased political junk on this informational
>> website...IT DOESN'T BELONG HERE!!!
>>
>> ______________
>>
>> Cultural Property Protection Net
>> http://www.cpprot.net/
>> subscribe at cpprot.net
>> unsubscribe at cpprot.net
>> list adress: list at cpprot.net
>> off list: moderator at cpprot.net
>> http://www.museum-security.org/
>> http://www.hansholbein.nl/basic_en.html
>> __________________
>>
>>
>
> ______________
>
> Cultural Property Protection Net
> http://www.cpprot.net/
> subscribe at cpprot.net
> unsubscribe at cpprot.net
> list adress: list at cpprot.net
> off list: moderator at cpprot.net
> http://www.museum-security.org/
> http://www.hansholbein.nl/basic_en.html
> __________________
>
>

-- 
Don Messerschmidt
EPC-1847
G.P.O. Box 8975 
Kathmandu, NEPAL
  *Tel: +977.1.554.5122 <--NEW NUMBER ***
  *Fax: +977.1.552.3707  <--NEW NUMBER ***
  *Email: emodus at wlink.com.np
  *Email (traveling & backstop...): donmxx at yahoo.com
					




______________

Cultural Property Protection Net
http://www.cpprot.net/
subscribe at cpprot.net
unsubscribe at cpprot.net
list adress: list at cpprot.net
off list: moderator at cpprot.net
http://www.museum-security.org/
http://www.hansholbein.nl/basic_en.html
__________________
The material in this email is confidential to the named recipient(s). It may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please do not copy, use or disclose this communication, notify us immediately and delete the email.


More information about the CPProt mailing list